W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > August 2014

Re: dwbp-ISSUE-29: Clarify requirements on metadata

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:37:40 +0200
Message-ID: <53F72B84.4090300@few.vu.nl>
To: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>

On 8/4/14 4:49 PM, Lee, Deirdre wrote:> If we define metadata as being 'data on the web', then all of the general requirements would also apply to metadata.
> The only two metadata-specific requirements would be R-MetadataAvailable and R-MetadataInteroperable

Depending on the recent discussions, it may be R-MetadataAvailable and R-MetadataStandardized ;-)

But if we have requirements formulated at a general MD level, could we remove the 'corresponding' ones at the specific level? At least for the requirement on Interoperable/Standardized?
I.e. if we have R-MetadataStandardized we don't need R-LicenseStandardized, because License is a kind of MD.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
> Sent: 03 June 2014 23:25
> To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
> Subject: dwbp-ISSUE-29: Clarify requirements on metadata
> dwbp-ISSUE-29: Clarify requirements on metadata
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/29
> Raised by: Antoine Isaac
> On product:
> The requirement on 'metadata' are not clear. To me license, provenance are also a form of metadata; perhaps even vocabularies: once we have spelled out these more specific levels, it's harder to figure out what remains in the general 'metadata'.
Received on Friday, 22 August 2014 11:38:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:25 UTC