- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:37:40 +0200
- To: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi, On 8/4/14 4:49 PM, Lee, Deirdre wrote:> If we define metadata as being 'data on the web', then all of the general requirements would also apply to metadata. > The only two metadata-specific requirements would be R-MetadataAvailable and R-MetadataInteroperable Depending on the recent discussions, it may be R-MetadataAvailable and R-MetadataStandardized ;-) But if we have requirements formulated at a general MD level, could we remove the 'corresponding' ones at the specific level? At least for the requirement on Interoperable/Standardized? I.e. if we have R-MetadataStandardized we don't need R-LicenseStandardized, because License is a kind of MD. Best, Antoine > > -----Original Message----- > From: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] > Sent: 03 June 2014 23:25 > To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > Subject: dwbp-ISSUE-29: Clarify requirements on metadata > > dwbp-ISSUE-29: Clarify requirements on metadata > > http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/29 > > Raised by: Antoine Isaac > On product: > > The requirement on 'metadata' are not clear. To me license, provenance are also a form of metadata; perhaps even vocabularies: once we have spelled out these more specific levels, it's harder to figure out what remains in the general 'metadata'. > > >
Received on Friday, 22 August 2014 11:38:09 UTC