- From: Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 14:43:18 +0000
- To: 'Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group' <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DA0D3B2CE5F5614AA2307A974AFAC39BFB61102B@UDSMBX02.uds.nuigalway.ie>
Hi, We had a good call today, addressing many of the raised issues for UCR. One issue that we felt warranted more discussion was ISSUE-23: Review definition of interoperability https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/23 The following questions were raised: Does standardisation imply interoperability? Are there cases where data uses standards, but is not interoperable? Can interoperability be achieved independent of standardisation? In DWBP, should we have a specific definition of interoperability? In the UCR, there are the following two requirements: * R-MetadataInteroperable * R-LicenseInteroperable And also * R-MetadataMachineRead * R-MetadataStandardized * R-LicenseMachineRead * R-LicenseStandardized Possible resolutions for the UCR could be: a. Remove R-MetadataInteroperable and R-LicenseInteroperable from UCR because they're redundant b. Improve description of R-MetadataStandardized and R-LicenseStandardized c. Other? Cheers, Deirdre ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Deirdre Lee Research Associate eGovernment Domain (DEG) Insight-NUIG IDA BusinessPark, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland deirdre.lee@deri.org<mailto:deirdre.lee@deri.org> skype: deirdrelee twitter: @deirdrelee linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/<http://ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 8 August 2014 14:43:49 UTC