- From: Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 08:17:53 +0000
- To: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
A URI should be sufficient, if the data is described with metadata. Unless there was a case where an author wanted to cite not only the data source, but also how they used the data? But this is probably outside of our scope. In any case I agree we make R-Citable a general requirement, as opposed to a data usage requirement. Best practice around how this requirement is implemented can be discussed by Best Practice group. -----Original Message----- From: Makx Dekkers [mailto:mail@makxdekkers.com] Sent: 04 August 2014 20:11 To: Lee, Deirdre; 'Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group' Subject: RE: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage DataCite is indeed for research data but you could imagine similar schemes for other types of data. Not saying we should do this, just that I wondered whether R-Citable intended to be more than requiring that data gets a URI. Makx. > -----Original Message----- > From: Lee, Deirdre [mailto:Deirdre.Lee@deri.org] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 4:39 PM > To: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group > Subject: RE: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data > Usage > > Okay, could move R-Citable a general requirement Datacite looks great; > does it only apply to research data, or could it apply to any data on > the web? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker > [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] > Sent: 03 June 2014 23:51 > To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > Subject: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data > Usage > > dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage > > http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/40 > > Raised by: Makx Dekkers > On product: > > I don’t understand how R-Citable is a requirement for Data Usage. It’s > much more general than that. And don’t URIs for data solve that > requirement already? Or do you mean that something like DataCite > https://www.datacite.org/ should be considered? > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2014 08:18:23 UTC