RE: dwbp-ISSUE-25: Review requirements: R-SelectHighValue and R-SelectHighDemand

Just because requirements are obvious, doesn't mean we shouldn't include them :)
Measuring what 'high-value' is may be subjective, but 'Datasets selected for publication should be in demand by potential users' is measurable. However not sure if not publishing data because there is no immediate/obvious demand is good best practice either...
Do these requirements make sense in the context of quality vocabulary?


-----Original Message-----
From: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] 
Sent: 03 June 2014 23:19
To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Subject: dwbp-ISSUE-25: Review requirements: R-SelectHighValue and R-SelectHighDemand

dwbp-ISSUE-25: Review requirements: R-SelectHighValue and R-SelectHighDemand

http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/25


Raised by: Antoine Isaac
On product: 

Could #20 (Radar Parlamentar) be grouped with #12 (Dados.gov.br)? It seems the former is actually a usage case of the latter.

Received on Monday, 4 August 2014 14:30:53 UTC