Sunday, 31 August 2014
Friday, 29 August 2014
- Updated UCR
- Re: Does standardisation assume interoperability?
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-29: Clarify requirements on metadata
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-25: Review requirements: R-SelectHighValue and R-SelectHighDemand
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-29: Clarify requirements on metadata
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-25: Review requirements: R-SelectHighValue and R-SelectHighDemand
- RE: Does standardisation assume interoperability?
- RE: Compact Uniform Resource Identifier (CURI)
- Agenda for the working group call
Thursday, 28 August 2014
- Re: Compact Uniform Resource Identifier (CURI)
- Re: Compact Uniform Resource Identifier (CURI)
- Compact Uniform Resource Identifier (CURI)
Tuesday, 26 August 2014
- RE: Action-67: remote participation at TPAC — sorted
- Action-67: remote participation at TPAC — sorted
Friday, 22 August 2014
- ISSUE-10: Data usage meaning
- Minutes from today's call
- Fw: Your article in Insurance Day
- Re: Does standardisation assume interoperability?
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-27: Review requirements for metadata, license, provenance and vocabularies to include as data pubication principles
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-28: Clarify the difference between R-DynamicGeneration and R-AutomaticUpdate
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-29: Clarify requirements on metadata
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-25: Review requirements: R-SelectHighValue and R-SelectHighDemand
- ACTION-64 Update
Thursday, 21 August 2014
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call
- Action-66 Conf call for Editors to help make progress
- Agenda for tomorrow's call
- Re: No vocabulary call tomorrow? - again
- Re: No vocabulary call tomorrow? - again
- Re: No vocabulary call tomorrow? - again
Wednesday, 20 August 2014
- Re: No vocabulary call tomorrow? - again
- DWBP call Friday
- RE: No vocabulary call tomorrow? - again
- Re: No vocabulary call tomorrow? - again
- No vocabulary call tomorrow? - again
Thursday, 14 August 2014
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's working group call
- RE: Agenda for tomorrow's working group call
- Agenda for tomorrow's working group call
Wednesday, 13 August 2014
Monday, 11 August 2014
- RE: Does standardisation assume interoperability?
- Re: Does standardisation assume interoperability?
- Re: Data is an asset - Data is a product
Sunday, 10 August 2014
Saturday, 9 August 2014
- Data is an asset - Data is a product
- [UCR] Idiosyncratic data (Geonames) dump in RDF
- Re: Does standardisation assume interoperability?
Friday, 8 August 2014
- Re: Does standardisation assume interoperability?
- RE: Re: dwbp-ISSUE-16: Improve Use case "Tracking of data usage"
- RE: Re: dwbp-ISSUE-8: Include more metadata about the use cases
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-11: Color challenges and requirements
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-18: Review Use case #8
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-4: To add a matrix table to summarize UCs vs challenges/requirements
- Does standardisation assume interoperability?
- Will be joining late...
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call
- RE: Agenda for tomorrow's call
Thursday, 7 August 2014
- RE: Agenda for tomorrow's call
- Regrets
- RE: Agenda for tomorrow's call
- Agenda for tomorrow's call
- Re: Proposal to use Friday meeting to address/close issues
Tuesday, 5 August 2014
- Re: No vocabulary call this week?
- Re: No vocabulary call this week?
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-36: Review requirement: R-FormatMachineRead
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage
- Re: No vocabulary call this week?
Monday, 4 August 2014
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-36: Review requirement: R-FormatMachineRead
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage
- Proposal to use Friday meeting to address/close issues
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-42 (Closed data): Have we covered closed data? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-38: Review motovation for R-SelectHighValue
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-35: Review requirement: R-GranularityMax
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-34: Review requirement: R-MetadataOpen
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-31: Define categories for the use cases based on the level of use cases details
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-27: Review requirements for metadata, license, provenance and vocabularies to include as data pubication principles
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-23: Review definition of interoperability
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-18: Review Use case #8
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-16: Improve Use case "Tracking of data usage"
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-11: Color challenges and requirements
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-8: Include more metadata about the use cases
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-28: Clarify the difference between R-DynamicGeneration and R-AutomaticUpdate
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-29: Clarify requirements on metadata
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-37: Change requirement's definition: R-FormatLocalise
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-36: Review requirement: R-FormatMachineRead
- RE: dwbp-ISSUE-25: Review requirements: R-SelectHighValue and R-SelectHighDemand