Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices

Thanks Eric, much appreciated.

Greg - you'll have a guest inn your meeting today :-)

Thanks again

Phil.

On 26/05/2016 13:37, Eric Stephan wrote:
> Phil,
>
> Yes, no problem, I can attend.
>
> Eric S
>
>
>> On May 26, 2016, at 12:50 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks very much for this Greg, very helpful.
>>
>> @Eric - thank you for taking up this particular baton. Are you able to join the call at 09:00 your time? It would be challenging for me to do so and, as you've shown, you're ahead of the rest of us on this one.
>>
>> Phil.
>>
>>> On 25/05/2016 13:47, Greg Norcie wrote:
>>> Hi Phil,
>>>
>>> Also wanted to say - if you want to join the PING call and discuss this a
>>> bit in a less asynchronous manner, it's happening tomorrow, I've C/Ped the
>>> details below:
>>>
>>>
>>> Privacy Interest Group Meetings
>>>  Next call: 26th May 2016
>>>  9am PT, 12pm ET, 6pm CET
>>>
>>>     WebEx meeting
>>>     https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=meda7c1b71d647aefa4377d4610c67648
>>>
>>>     +1 617-324-0000
>>>     meeting number: 648 986 475
>>>
>>> Please also join us in IRC in the #privacy room.
>>>     Server: irc.w3.org
>>>     Username: <your name>
>>>     Port: 6667 or 6665
>>>     Channel: #privacy
>>>
>>> https://www.w3.org/Privacy/
>>>
>>>
>>> /********************************************/
>>> Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org)
>>> Staff Technologist
>>> Center for Democracy & Technology
>>> District of Columbia office
>>> (p) 202-637-9800
>>> PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt
>>>
>>> /*******************************************/
>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Looks like you got that gig then, Eric - thank you!
>>>>
>>>> As you know, Eric, it's the privacy issues that you raised about data and
>>>> metadata that are the potential overlap. I don't imagine the PING folks
>>>> will have a lot to say about persistent identifiers, API calls etc. so I
>>>> hope that we can minimise what we're asking Greg and his colleagues to do.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Phil.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 24/05/2016 20:41, Eric Stephan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Greg, Phil, and DWBP WG,
>>>>>
>>>>> It almost seems like a matrix (table) of privacy questions and the best
>>>>> practices would be useful, blank cells could reflect non-applicability.
>>>>> What do you think?  If it is useful, I am happy to help.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Eric Stephan
>>>>> Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Phil,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for reaching out! Sorry to hear about your tight deadline.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In order to speed things up, as a first, step, could you or someone from
>>>>>> the HTML5 team please use the PING Privacy Questionnaire[1] to do an
>>>>>> initial self review of your standard? (We would also love to get feedback
>>>>>> on how the privacy questionnaire can be improved :) )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd be happy to work with you and your team to identify any remaining
>>>>>> issues that may be present in addition to those uncovered by the self
>>>>>> review.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a PING call on 5/26 as well in case you want to join in and
>>>>>> discuss further.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /********************************************/
>>>>>> Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org)
>>>>>> Staff Technologist
>>>>>> Center for Democracy & Technology
>>>>>> District of Columbia office
>>>>>> (p) 202-637-9800
>>>>>> PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /*******************************************/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Ping members,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group has published three
>>>>>>> documents that are close to completion, two of which we'd be grateful if
>>>>>>> you could review. In general, privacy issues don't arise in this work
>>>>>>> but:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. The Data on the Web Best Practices document itself has references to
>>>>>>> privacy in its introduction [1] and in a section on data enrichment [2].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. The WG's charter [3] includes the line: "Ensure that the privacy
>>>>>>> concerns are properly included in the Quality and Granularity
>>>>>>> vocabulary."
>>>>>>> The vocabulary in question is at [4] and we would be grateful if you
>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>> confirm that no specific privacy issues are raised by that work (I
>>>>>>> think it
>>>>>>> unlikely but I may be missing something).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The WG plans to make the transition to CR for its BP doc (which is Rec
>>>>>>> Track) during next month so we're setting a (very) tight deadline on
>>>>>>> comments of 12 June.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for your help,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Phil.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#intro
>>>>>>> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#enrichment
>>>>>>> [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/05/odbp-charter#coordination
>>>>>>> [4] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-dqv-20160519/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Phil Archer
>>>>>>> W3C Data Activity Lead
>>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://philarcher.org
>>>>>>> +44 (0)7887 767755
>>>>>>> @philarcher1
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Phil Archer
>>>> W3C Data Activity Lead
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>>>>
>>>> http://philarcher.org
>>>> +44 (0)7887 767755
>>>> @philarcher1
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Phil Archer
>> W3C Data Activity Lead
>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>>
>> http://philarcher.org
>> +44 (0)7887 767755
>> @philarcher1
>

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1

Received on Thursday, 26 May 2016 13:01:40 UTC