- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 14:47:29 +0000
- To: Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br>
- Cc: public-dwbp-comments@w3.org, public-sdw-comments@w3.org, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br>, "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Payam Barnaghi <p.barnaghi@surrey.ac.uk>
Thanks for pointing out the problem with the bp-summary function, Newton. For those that haven't noticed yet, the bp-summary function in the new version of everyone's favourite spec writing tool has borked. Masters of the universe (including Shane McCarron) are aware of it and working on it. And I've raised it as an issue in GitHub so it must be official! https://github.com/w3c/respec-docs/issues/43 Phil. -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2016 14:47:43 UTC