- From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:05:53 -0300
- To: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Cc: Silvio Peroni <silvio.peroni@unibo.it>, public-dwbp-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CANx1Pzzx+oyBr5MtfGySHh=mAaGDuV7zvPAohxABf-fV2VN0XA@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Dr. Peroni, I am one of the DUV co-authors and I'd like to say that we really appreciate your feedback. We have discussed some of your questions about the meaning of the duv:DataCitation class and our idea was to use duv:dataCitation as a "bibliographic reference contained in an entity, e.g., a paper (i.e., the citing paper), to a particular dataset". So, considering the example that you gave, we made the following changes: - the class duv:DataCitation was replaced by the class biro:BibliographicReference - the object property cito:hasCitingEntity was included to connect cito:CitationAct and frbr:Work The current diagram is available here [1]. Please feel free to make comments and suggestions. Many thanks again! Bernadette [1] https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxTZf3B9yQ3oNDJoUFBvRHR5cUU/view?usp=sharing 2015-12-29 4:11 GMT-03:00 Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>: > Hi Dr Peroni, > > >>I’m just wondering right now… I don’t know what is the right meaning of > the duv:DataCitation class, but I think two alternatives are possible: > > >> 1. it is a bibliographic reference contained in an entity, e.g., a > paper (i.e., the citing paper), to a particular dataset, which is then > characterised by a text that, in some way, refers to the actual cited > dataset; > >>2. it is the actual dataset that is cited by the citing entity. > > Thank you once again for your valuable feedback. To help provide you with > a better perspective or our rationale for the DataCitation class it was an > attempt to ensure we had all of the essential citation information for > datasets based on common requirements[1][2][3] . To me, properties of the > DataCitation class could be capable of being expressed as a reference in a > journal article or as a metadata record. The attempt was to support a dual > purpose. > > From the helpful examples you provided below, I'm using this as guidance > as to how we can achieve the above reusing the SPAR ontologies as you have > illustrated. I'll send an update to the vocabulary based on your feedback > and send you an email so that you can review our latest updates. > > > Many thanks again, > > Eric Stephan > > References > [1] http://libguides.lib.msu.edu/citedata > [2] http://einstein.library.emory.edu/citations_general.html > [3] > http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/datamanagement/citations.html > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Silvio Peroni <silvio.peroni@unibo.it> > wrote: > >> Dear Eric, >> >> Thank you so much for your kind response and very helpful guidance on the >> use of SPAR ontologies. Our citation model is very fluid at this point >> where it is easy to make changes and I would prefer making changes based on >> your recommendations prior to our request for comments in early January. >> >> >> That’s great! >> >> We did look at biro:BibliographicRecord at one point but weren't sure >> about its use. I'll look over this, if we find additional properties that >> are not in the scope of biro:BibliographicRecord I am wondering if our >> additional properties could serve as requests for additional properties >> within BIRO? If we did use this I'd have to ask our other co-editors about >> the use of FaBIO:work. >> >> >> I’m just wondering right now… I don’t know what is the right meaning of >> the duv:DataCitation class, but I think two alternatives are possible: >> >> 1. it is a bibliographic reference contained in an entity, e.g., a paper >> (i.e., the citing paper), to a particular dataset, which is then >> characterised by a text that, in some way, refers to the actual cited >> dataset; >> 2. it is the actual dataset that is cited by the citing entity. >> >> If 1) is true, then it seems quite odd to me that a reference has a title >> and other attributes typically related with a proper bibliographic >> resource: they are actually attributes of the referenced work. In SPAR, >> that scenario could be modelled by means of the class >> bibo:BibliographicReference and the classes fabio:Work and fabio:Expression >> (or one of their subclasses). For instance, suppose that we have a paper A >> citing a dataset B by using the following bibliographic reference: >> >> Doe, J. (2015). The example dataset to cite. Version 1, Sept 15, 2015. >> DOI: 10.3456/4567.21 >> >> Then, in SPAR, a good way for modelling this will be (I’m using Turtle >> now): >> >> :dataset-b a fabio:Dataset , dcat:Dataset ; >> dcterms:title "The example dataset to cite" ; >> prism:doi "10.3456/4567.21" ; >> dcterms:creator :j-doe ; >> frbr:realization :dataset-b-v1 . >> >> :dataset-b-v1 a fabio:Expression ; >> pav:version "Version 1" ; >> prism:publicationDate "2015-09-15"^^xsd:date . >> >> :paper-a-work a fabio:ResearchPaper ; >> frbr:realization :paper-a-expression . >> >> :paper-a-expression a fabio:JournalArticle ; >> frbr:part :reference-to-dataset-b . >> >> :reference-to-dataset-b a biro:BibliographicReference, duv:DataCitation ; >> dcterms:bibliographicCitation "Doe, J. (2015). The example dataset to >> cite. Version 1, Sept 15, 2015. DOI: 10.3456/4567.21" ; >> biro:references :dataset-b-2015-04-01 . >> >> :paper-a-cites-dataset-b a cito:CitationAct ; >> cito:hasCitingEntity :paper-a-expression ; >> cito:hasCitedEntity :dataset-b-v1 . >> >> As you can see, the title, the DOI, etc., are not attributes of the >> bibliographic reference included in the citing paper, but are attributes of >> the actual cited dataset. Note that I’ve used pav:version ( >> http://pav-ontology.github.io/pav/) for indicating the version number >> here because dcterms:hasVersion actually relates two resources rather than >> a resource with a literal. Note that here the duv:hasWork has been replaced >> by frbr:part (in the other direction, but also frbr:partOf exist in case it >> is needed). >> >> Another note: when we speak about citations, expressions (in terms of >> FaBiO/FRBR ontological entities) should always exist, since they actually >> define the actual content of a paper/dataset rather than its pure essence >> (i.e., the FaBiO/FRBR work). Citations, in our scenarios, should exist only >> when they are explicitly created by means of a text. That’s why I’ve used >> fabio:Expression and fabio:JournalArticle (which is a subclass of >> fabio:Expression) as proper entities linked to the related works (i.e., >> fabio:ResearchPaper and fabio:Dataset, that are subclasses of fabio:Work). >> >> On the other hand, if the alternative 2) is true, then, we can avoid the >> explicit specification of such :reference-to-dataset-b, and consider our >> duv:DataCitation as the dataset (actually, a particular version of a >> dataset) cited. But then I’m not sure duv:DataCitation is actually a good >> name, it may be just fabio:Expression. >> >> It might interest you as well that we are looking at several non-semantic >> vocabularies expressed in XML ( >> https://www.force11.org/sites/default/files/d7/project/882/citing-data-in-jats-2015-06.pdf) >> >> >> >> I’ve done a bit of work on JATS to SPAR conversion (see [1] for more >> details), and, while the mapping is always possible, it is not so direct as >> one can guess. I didn’t know about this new spec from Debbie, but it seems >> a very good XML spec to me, thanks. >> >> and JSON (e.g. http://okfnlabs.org/bibjson/) and the BFO/IBO/IAO >> ontology suite . >> >> >> I know them, but honestly not an expert yet. >> >> I'd like to attempt map citation classes from the SPAR vocabularies to >> these within the scope of DUV to get buy-in about our approach in other >> metadata communities. If you are aware of any work like this and can let >> us know, please let me know. >> >> >> Beside the JATS to SPAR work, I don’t have any. However, I would be >> interested in working on the mapping between BibJSON and SPAR indeed… >> >> I hope it may help. >> Have a nice day :-) >> >> S. >> >> >> # Rererences >> 1. Peroni, S., Lapeyre, D. A., Shotton, D. (2012). Mapping JATS to RDF >> using the SPAR (Semantic Publishing and Referencing) Ontologies. In >> Proceeding of the Journal Article Tag Suite Conference 2012 (JATS-Con >> 2012). Bethesda, Maryland, USA: National Center for Biotechnology >> Information. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK100491/ >> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Silvio Peroni, Ph.D. >> Department of Computer Science and Engineering >> University of Bologna, Bologna (Italy) >> Tel: +39 051 2094871 >> E-mail: silvio.peroni@unibo.it >> Web: http://www.essepuntato.it >> Twitter: essepuntato >> >> > -- Bernadette Farias Lóscio Centro de Informática Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2016 21:06:44 UTC