W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-comments@w3.org > December 2016

Fwd: Feedback on current editor draft of BPs

From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 09:49:22 -0300
Message-ID: <CANx1PzyKAySD1VdzOsvFaOkDRaVYMwZcNXDVS3Ggn7jN0C6VbQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: W3C DWBP WG - Comments <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-12-05 8:38 GMT-03:00
Subject: Re: Feedback on current editor draft of BPs
To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>


Hello Bernadette,

Sounds great! Thank a lot for considering all my much belated comments :-)

Christophe

On 5 December 2016 at 11:04, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
wrote:

> Hello Christophe,
>
> Thanks again for being so supportive :)
>
> I think that now I got your point about the commits 1509848
> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/1509848f1ecd212ee3fcc9e1211a123b96f56bb0>
>  and 9873c6b
> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/9873c6bb8f602a977729ad993614840bf0bf81a2>
>  .
>
> I agree with you about making the 'scope' and the 'why' sections
> consistent. We're going to follow your suggestion.
>
> Concerning the commit 9873c6b
> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/9873c6bb8f602a977729ad993614840bf0bf81a2>,
> I also agree with removing of 'dct:publisher :transport-agency-mycity'.
> We're going to follow your suggestion.
>
> Cheers,
> Berna
>
>
>
>
> 2016-12-05 4:55 GMT-03:00 Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Bernadette,
>>
>> My comments on your commits are listed below.
>>>
>> And my responses are in-lined... :)
>>
>>
>>> 1509848
>>> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/1509848f1ecd212ee3fcc9e1211a123b96f56bb0> I
>>> think this edition changes the semantics of the question. The BP should
>>> deal with something that is unique to the Web. I suggest to not change this
>>> sentence.
>>>
>> The point is probably more about the wording than the semantic. The scope
>> section say "specifically relevant" and the test says "unique". I wonder if
>> the two can be considered equivalent or not, and if not suggested we could
>> adjust the text to make it consistent. That could also mean changing the
>> "specifically relevant" into "unique" instead of the inverse. But I
>> otherwise agree not to touch it.
>>
>>
>>> 9873c6b
>>> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/9873c6bb8f602a977729ad993614840bf0bf81a2> I
>>> think we should leave dct:publisher because this can also be seen as a
>>> descriptive metadata, no? I agree with including dct:language.
>>>
>> Ok but then I think the description of :transport-agency-mycity should be
>> added to the example. It was also a remark about not adding elements which
>> are introduced later.
>>
>> bf13401
>>> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/bf134013217aaab698a257e814d53fb896b38dfb> My
>>> suggestion:
>>> Examples of the application of some Best Practices are shown using
>>> Turtle [[Turtle]] or JSON-LD [[JSON-LD]]
>>>
>> Ok!
>>
>>
>>> 0f5f29a
>>> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/0f5f29af971b9ae241d1e5a3382787a4a281bb12> The
>>> idea in this case is that a machine can find the data license, but the data
>>> license itself doesn't need to be processable.
>>>
>> Ok!
>>
>>
>>> db17381
>>> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/db17381dfa68740960d5ee75985181a551ca4694> I
>>> think it is ok to leave axiom. There is also a reference to OWL2, so more
>>> details can be found there.
>>>
>> Ok!
>>
>>
>>> 7374375
>>> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/737437595ec6177ffe656e8e41c611326470e763> I
>>> think if we change the first sentence to remove the reference to sensitive
>>> data, then it becomes more generic and solves the problem.
>>>
>>  Ok!
>>
>> 0c313df
>>> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/0c313df66691323f9f81e44fc3ac256cf96ee887> I
>>> think so. However, I think this update requires a major change on the BP. I
>>> suggest to leave the way it is.
>>>
>> Ok let's leave it then :-)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Christophe
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Bernadette
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2016-11-28 10:38 GMT-03:00 Christophe Guéret <
>>> christophe.gueret@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Bernadette,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for considering all the comments :-)
>>>> As you saw I just commented further (at the bottom) on your comment "
>>>> e70fc2c
>>>> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/e70fc2cba67d453b7e6d163cffb68a14bf83cb5a> I
>>>> used the http://www.geonames.org/3399415 and it worked. Is it really
>>>> necessary to change?"because I think that the change is indeed needed
>>>> to get working LD links.
>>>>
>>>> Regarding "c7496c2
>>>> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/c7496c219747b2138ccb7d1570a1880cb210de51> The
>>>> example shows the inclusion of the locale parameters metadata, followed by
>>>> a locale-neutral representation of bus fare data. The example has to parts:
>>>> one that shows that metadata and the other one to show an example of
>>>> representation. I suggest to leave it like this." I understand these
>>>> are two different parts but still think it's confusing to see them
>>>> together. Maybe you could just split that code into two <pre> ?
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Christophe
>>>>
>>>> On 28 November 2016 at 12:41, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Christophe,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot for your detailed review! I checked each one of the
>>>>> commits and most of them are editorial changes and can easily be
>>>>> incorporated on the document.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to kindly ask you to take a look on comments that I included
>>>>> on the pull request [1] and please let me know if you are ok with them.
>>>>>
>>>>> kind regards,
>>>>> Bernadette
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/474
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-10-06 19:46 GMT-03:00 Christophe Guéret <
>>>>> christophe.gueret@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Congrats on all the great work :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have (finally !) been through the latest draft of the best
>>>>>> practices and made a number of comments which I just proposed with a pull
>>>>>> request (https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/474). Hope you will find
>>>>>> those useful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Christophe
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>>>> Centro de Informática
>>>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ----------------
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>> Centro de Informática
>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ----------------
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
>




-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2016 12:50:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:38:14 UTC