Re: "metadata" as "data about data"

Would you please provide an example where the text we use could lead to
conceptual confusion?

I don't understand the disclaimer suggested by Dan. What is meant by
"absolute" distinction?

best regards,
João Paulo

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> On 5 March 2015 at 16:20, Christophe Guéret
> <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl> wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Thanks for this! Funny thing is that I was sitting in a meeting with KOS
> > people today and when I asked them to comment on our document they also
> > pointed out that this definition of metadata would not fit everyone.
>
> Some debates are destined to go on forever :) Thanks for considering
> the suggestion...
>
> Dan
>
>