Re: DPUB-ARIA exit criteria

Since dpub-aria has NO new states or properties, the testing is actually
pretty simple.  It is just ensuring that role values are exposed at the
ATAPI layer.  For this sort of test...  well, I have a nifty idea.  Rich,
we don't need to do a wiki unless you really want to.  Just the rules for
each platform (AAM rules) and a list of the roles.  Then initiate
conversation with the ATTA via javascript, see what ATAPI is supported, and
start populating a div a role then checking to ensure it is exposed.  Loop
until complete.

Or am I missing something?

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

>
> On 20 Oct 2016, at 23:55, Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wiley.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Following up on this email and today’s meeting:
>
> 1.       Ivan, would you please clarify if this was based on a discussion
> with Ralph? To confirm, Ralph was OK with publisher/author implementation
> of either the DPUB-ARIA roles or their predecessors in epub:type vocabulary?
>
>
> Yes.
>
> 2.       Shane, what do you need from DPUB to arrange formal testing
> procedures?
> 3.       We need to document our exit criteria for CR. Our plan is to
> publish in mid-November. Michael has asked us for this documentation by 4
> Nov (ideally) (really no later than 8 Nov). I have not worked on this sort
> of thing before. I assume, Ivan and Shane that you are pros.   Happy to
> help out.
>
>
> Happy to do something, but I cannot commit before next week. I travel
> today (Friday) from Taiyuan to Beijing and, on Sunday, back to Amsterdam.
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
>
> Tzviya
>
> *Tzviya Siegman*
> Information Standards Lead
> Wiley
> 201-748-6884
> tsiegman@wiley.com
>
> *From:* Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org <ivan@w3.org>]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 29, 2016 11:40 AM
> *To:* Shane McCarron
> *Cc:* Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken; Richard Schwerdtfeger; Michael Cooper
> *Subject:* Re: chat with Ralph
>
>
>
> On 29 Sep 2016, at 17:35, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:
>
> I assume you meant "However, for this case *if* we cannot do that…"
>
>
> Oops, sorry…
>
> (Never send a mail while on a call…:-)
>
>
>
> I can imagine a really simple web service that you could submit content to
> that would look for role values and tabulate them.  Ask for a little
> information to correlate the usage with the "user" (publisher).  Map the
> results against the terms in the document.
>
> If there is interest in that, I will have someone throw it together.
> That's what Spec-Ops is here for!
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> I have chatted with him on the (vocabulary) exit criteria. Bottom line:
>
> - Ideally, we should indeed have, for each term, at least two
> publishers/authors who use that term. Not necessarily in absolute full
> production, but at least, as a start, in some preliminary uses
> - However, for this case, we cannot do that, we should have for each term,
> at least two publishers/authors that use the semantically equivalent
> epub:type value. Ie, if the only difference is syntax, then that should be
> fine.
>
> Would that work?
>
> Ivan
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
>
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Shane McCarron
> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
>
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops