- From: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:07:20 -0500
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C PF - DPUB Joint Task Force <public-dpub-aria@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJdbnOC9donbCyw7JaxqgvbQPpCeOC01_zLfn7k=9udYJ67B5A@mail.gmail.com>
Note that either the textarea into which publishers paste data OR the script that iterates over a collection of input files would generate the same sort of output that would in turn generate the test report. I don't mind which solution we use. Just pointing out the pseudo-obvious. On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > On 4 Nov 2016, at 15:26, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote: > > I was doing some work on DPUB testing this morning, and I wanted to > capture some ideas here to see if they resonate with anyone else. In no > particular order they are: > > > - We can easily use WPT to exercise a11y api mappings with the new > ATTA stuff [1]. This will work on major platforms. It will not (yet) work > on proprietary platforms, but we don't have mappings for those anyway! I > think that this is all that is needed to provide testing of dpub-aam and > get that over the CR hurdle. > > Brilliant. > > > - We could use WPT and a simple interface to check dpub-aria documents > for role attribute usage. This would be a purely manual check in that a > user would need to put content into a text area then run the test. This > would allow basically anyone who can access the internet to run their own > tests. > - Another way would be to write a simple scripts to run over input and > extract role attribute value usage. This would NOT be part of the WPT > environment, but would probably be useful if someone wanted to process a > ton of HTML documents. > > I am tempted to go for the second option here, because my gut feeling is > it may make it easier to generate a decent and readable report of the > testing, with names and references to the users, etc. The report should be > easy to read for the Director… > > > - We could probably figure out a way to automate the manual test > option above, but it would require some sort of instrumentation on the part > of the test users (e.g., a web server with a folder full of files that it > could retrieve). > > I do not think we should go there. > > Ivan > > Thoughts? Other ideas? > > [1] https://spec-ops.github.io/atta-api/index.html > > -- > Shane McCarron > Projects Manager, Spec-Ops > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Technical Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > > > -- Shane McCarron Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
Received on Friday, 4 November 2016 15:08:19 UTC