RE: [dpub-aria] 20151001 agenda

We are working on getting agreement on the term. There is some talk about
using rel. but that creates other issues.

Matt, would you like me to change the dpub- prefixes to doc- prefixes in
the dpub aria module?

I am doing it now for the mapping spec.


Rich Schwerdtfeger

From:	<>
To:	Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Tzviya - Hoboken
            Siegman <>
Cc:	"DPUB-ARIA" <>
Date:	09/30/2015 03:42 PM
Subject:	RE: [dpub-aria] 20151001 agenda

It's on my plate to remove those from the document. I just wanted
confirmation of term last week, as I didn't see it in the last published
draft and I must have been viewing a cached version of the nightly build as
I couldn't find it there when I looked.


Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:43:43 -0500
Subject: Re: [dpub-aria] 20151001 agenda


We have these roles dpub-glossterm and dpub-glossref. Is there any reason
we cannot simply use the term and Definiton roles :

Seeing that these would reside in a Glossary region. We could require that
the Glossary have definition and term as required descendants.


Rich Schwerdtfeger

Received on Friday, 9 October 2015 13:56:30 UTC