Re: [dpub-aria] 4 skeleton sections added

Hi all,
FYI, I just synced up some stuff [1] for the 4 skeleton terms that 
reflects the input we got on the call last week. We are still pending on 
the JS autogeneration of some (+to know which) fields based on 
inheritance from the mother spec -- that's one reason why they still 
look a tad, shall we say, bleak. Using inlined .ednotes to capture all 
questions/open issues we've got so far.

To remind ourselves, where Tzviya and I would like to get asap is to a 
point where these four terms look generally ok in terms of the actual 
layout, so that we can fill in the rest of the terms, publish a first ed 
draft, and then get going on the real discussions re inheritance, 
differentiation, superfluousness, behaviors etc.

[1] https://github.com/w3c/aria/commits/master/aria/dpub.html

/markus
> Markus Gylling <mailto:markus.gylling@gmail.com>
> 26 Jan 2015 14:22
> Hi all,
> I just pushed 4 skeleton role defs to aria/dpub.html in master. In 
> hopes that they will be good to serve for the initial exercise of the 
> approach, I chose the four terms relating to glossaries (this gives us 
> a xhv vocab dupe, parent/child relationships, region and atomic types, 
> and a link type). Shane, I looked in the wiki for parent roles, but 
> didnt see any (or did I look at the wrong page? [1]); made up three of 
> my own in the meanwhile. And, needless to say, many placeholders left 
> to fill in.
>
> For now, /markus
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/DPUBVocabulary
>