Re: draft text for charter

I am fine with this text. It's longer than I thought Ivan wanted it to
be,  but if he thinks it's aan acceptable length I think it's relatively
clear while also being explicit  about the fact that we will incorporate
accessibility requirements in any recommendation-track deliverables,,
and the fact that we will be coordinating with other groups.

My only issue  is the following:

"The Digital Publishing Working Group will coordinate with the WCAG Working
Group to integrate accessibility requirements created as part of its
recommendation-track deliverables into generalized technology."

I don't think we should be limiting ourselves to coordinating with WCAG.
I would prefer  "will coordinate with the WCAG Working Group, as well as
any other  working groups as needed, to integrate ..."

Deborah

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Avneesh Singh wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> A reminder, we need to complete the text for accessibility soon. Please 
> provide your comments so that it can be published with next update of 
> charter.
>
>
> With regards
> Avneesh
> -----Original Message----- From: Avneesh Singh
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 12:34
> To: George Kerscher ; 'Ivan Herman'
> Cc: 'Deborah Kaplan' ; public-dpub-accessibility@w3.org
> Subject: Re: draft text for charter
>
> Dear accessibility group,
>
> After our call yesterday, George has merged the old accessibility text that
> was proposed by Matt with the new text added by Ivan in the branch.
> I will also like to mention that in the branch created by Ivan, the
> accessibility text is placed at more than one places. The first paragraph
> was placed by Ivan in the scope statement, and other part was placed at the
> places where the charter talked about coordination with ARIA and WCAG.
> We are fine with this split, and the new text snippet is the rewrite of only
> the scope statements.
>
> New text for scope statement:
> The Working Group will incorporate accessibility considerations into the
> Working Group's deliverables. Recommendation-track deliverables  will
> contain mechanisms to make Web Publications accessible to a broad range of
> readers with different needs and capabilities. This includes general WCAG
> and WAI requirements of the W3C; additional extended requirements will be
> identified as conformance requirements in the Working Group’s normative
> specifications. Profiles of Web Publications may be defined with more
> stringent accessibility requirements.
>
> And following is the text in coordination section:
> The Digital Publishing Working Group will coordinate with the WCAG Working
> Group to integrate accessibility requirements created as part of its
> recommendation-track deliverables into generalized technology. One or more
> pipeline of the requirements will be maintained to manage diverse turnaround
> times of the W3C groups.
>
> With regards
> Avneesh