- From: Rhys Lewis <Rhys.Lewis@volantis.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:08:17 +0000
- To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM> , "public-diselect-editors@w3.org" <public-diselect-editors@w3.org>
Hello Norm, Thanks for your comments and your confirmation that we've probably not done anything bad with respect to XPath. As for the description of the nodesets returned by the functions in section 2, you are absolutely right. Whilst correct, the statements are less than entirely useful. Despite last call formally being closed, we'll review those and expand on them for our CR draft. Thanks once again Best wishes Rhys -----Original Message----- From: public-diselect-editors-request@w3.org [mailto:public-diselect-editors-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh Sent: 07 February 2007 19:25 To: public-diselect-editors@w3.org Subject: XML CG comments on Delivery Context: XPath Access Functions 1.0 Apologies or the tardy reply. On behalf of the XML CG, I took an action to review Delivery Context: XPath Access Functions 1.0. I didn't see anything in this document that seemed incorrect or inappropriate from an XPath perspective. As a general note, the descriptions of the functions seem to be lacking in detail. Many, for example, assert that "this function returns a node set containing just one node" but nowhere describe what kind of node is returned, what value it might have, or how it might have been calculated. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh XML Standards Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:09:58 UTC