Hello Elliotte, DIWG has noted that you did not accept the disposition of your comments against the first last call of DISelect [1]. Unfortunately, DIWG disagrees with your assertion that it necessarily reintroduces a mixing of concerns. DIWG has now published an updated Primer for DISelect [2]. While not complete, it does address the issue of separation of concerns and how DISelect can be used positively to enhance such separation. We hope that you may find it possible to agree with the disposition of comments [1] after examining the primer. If so, perhaps you could indicate that by posting to this list? Very best wishes, and thanks for your time on this topic Rhys Lewis [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2006JanMar/0008.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/cselection-primer/
Received on Monday, 29 January 2007 16:13:54 UTC