- From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 23:36:13 -0500
- To: public-diselect-editors@w3.org
Works for me. Disposition accepted. At 4:38 PM +0000 12/9/05, Roland Merrick wrote: >Greetings Al, thanks for your comments on the content selection last >call [1]. As part of this you include >"<http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-cselection-20050502/#error-events>Exception >handling" which we have split into two parts. This response deals >with the part that begins: "The wording in this section is IMHO >non-standard and should be regularized. " The second part was >addressed in the attached note. > >The DIWG assigned this comment the identifier Gilman-16. > >This mail documents DIWG's response to your comments. > >DIWG Response >============= > >We have not accepted this part of the comments, the exception >handling model and terminology is meant to be completely consistent >with that of XForms. For reasons of consistency, DIWG has chosen to >retain that terminology. However there are typographic errors in >this section which we will address in Gilman-17. > >[1] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2005AprJun/0012.html > >Regards, Roland >----- Forwarded by Roland Merrick/UK/IBM on 09/12/2005 16:32 ----- >Roland Merrick/UK/IBM > >17/11/2005 15:49 >To >public-diselect-editors@w3.org >cc >w3c-di-wg@w3.org >Subject >Gilman-17 > > > > >Greetings Al, thanks for your comments on the content selection last >call [1]. As part of this you include >"<http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-cselection-20050502/#error-events>Exception >handling" which we have split into two parts. This response deals >with the part that states: "The nouns in the <dl> explanation of the >categories *must* be aligned with the suffixes used in the event >names. Also the prose in the paragraphs. In the current prose >there are two concepts used (failure and error in the above lexicon) >and three ways that each is alluded to. Fix it." > >The DIWG assigned this comment the identifier Gilman-17. > >This mail documents DIWG's response to your comments. > >DIWG Response >============= > >We agree and have corrected the typographical errors. We now use the >terms error and exception consistently throughout the document. >Other changes in this area of the document are anticipated in order >to address Gilman-10 and McCathieNevile-5. > >[1] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2005AprJun/0012.html > >Regards, Roland
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 04:36:39 UTC