- From: Rhys Lewis <Rhys.Lewis@volantis.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:15:36 +0100
- To: "chaals@opera.com" <chaals@opera.com>
- CC: "public-diselect-editors@w3.org" <public-diselect-editors@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 8 September 2006 15:16:24 UTC
Generator Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium) Hi Chaals, We' re just in the process of reviewing disposition of comments on the first last call of content selection [1]. We don' t appear ever to have responded to your sixth comment which states: <snip>Navigating the specification document would have been easier with at least a link element to its table of contents </snip> I' d like to apologise for the delay in responding to this part of your comments. The DIWG assigned this comment the identifier McCathieNevile-6. DIWG Response ------------------------ DIWG has sympathy with this comment. We are, however, constrained, to some degree, by the W3C tools that we have chosen to use to create the specification. We will improve the navigation by preparing a version of the specification as a set of HTML files, in addition to the single HTML file version. To this extent, we accept the comment. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2005AprJun/0010.html Best wishes Rhys
Received on Friday, 8 September 2006 15:16:24 UTC