Gilman-17

Greetings Al, thanks for your comments on the content selection last call 
[1]. As part of this you include "Exception handling" which we have split 
into two parts. This response deals with the part that states: "The nouns 
in the <dl> explanation of the categories *must* be aligned with the 
suffixes used in the event names.  Also the prose in the paragraphs.  In 
the current prose there are two concepts used (failure and error in the 
above lexicon) and three ways that each is alluded to.  Fix it." 

The DIWG assigned this comment the identifier Gilman-17.

This mail documents DIWG's response to your comments.

DIWG Response
=============

We agree and have corrected the typographical errors. We now use the terms 
error and exception consistently throughout the document. Other changes in 
this area of the document are anticipated in order to address Gilman-10 
and McCathieNevile-5.

[1] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2005AprJun/0012.html 


Regards, Roland