Re: W3C interest group

Hi Ivan,

Thank you for the clarification, I was probably a misunderstanding by me.
I'd be happy to take part in this group if possible.
Cooperation between the two organizations (IDPF and W3C) is very important
in my opinion.

-- 
Ori Idan



On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> Ori,
>
> thanks for your interest. But... I am not sure I understand your comments.
> The charter is specifically for a _non_ ad-hoc group, i.e., an Interest
> Group, whose charter is planning the type of liaisons that you are
> referring to:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2013/02/digpubig.html
>
> What is ad-hoc indeed is the CSS/EPUB phone discussions that we may set up
> (if there are enough interest) later this month or early May. Any results
> of that discussion would flow into the IG as soon as that one is up and
> running, at which time it will subsume any ad-hoc discussion.
>
> My apology if these messages were not clear...
>
> Ivan
>
> On Apr 12, 2013, at 21:59 , Ori Idan <ori@heliconbooks.com> wrote:
>
> > I think this group should not be a single ad-hoc group but rather a
> group that will exist within the W3C and be in charge of liaisons between
> the W3C working groups and the IDPF working group.
> > As a member of the IDPF I often see that we need such a constant
> cooprations.
> >
> > I'd be interested in taking part in the discussions of such a group.
> >
> > --
> > Ori Idan
> >
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>
>
>
>
>