Re: Comment re http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-dpub-annotation-uc-20140313/

Hi Robert,

FYI: Some work in progress:

The PF ARIA task force is forming a subteamp to start defining
accessibility semantics for drawings. We will probably begin with charts.
Maps will be some time away. Some drawling packages like Dojo GFX use html,
script, and css to produce charts using text/html content. We will plan to
apply these semantics to HTML canvas fallback content as well as SVG. Note:
SVG2 also incorporates the canvas element.


Rich


Rich Schwerdtfeger



From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, W3C Public Digital
            Publishing Mailing List <public-digipub@w3.org>
Date: 03/14/2014 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: Comment re
            http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-dpub-annotation-uc-20140313/





I don't think that the format of the map would change the requirements or
the use cases.  An embedded SVG map would be covered under 2.2.5, and a
stand alone SVG map wouldn't be.

And a caveat to both, annotating the entire stand alone map is covered
under 2.1.*, just not segments of it.

Rob


On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
wrote:
  What if the map is in SVG?  Wouldn’t that cause it to fall here, since
  SVG is part of HTML5?

  Leonard

  From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
  Date: Friday, March 14, 2014 at 10:53 AM
  To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
  Cc: W3C Public Digital Publishing Mailing List <public-digipub@w3.org>
  Subject: Re: Comment re
  http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-dpub-annotation-uc-20140313/

  Resent-From: <public-digipub@w3.org>
  Resent-Date: Friday, March 14, 2014 at 10:54 AM


  Hi Art,

  There are no use cases /specifically/ about maps, but annotating a
  digitized image of a physical map or born digital image would be covered
  under 2.2.4.   This assumes the map is embedded in a larger publication
  rather than being a stand-alone resource. I agree there isn't a use case
  that directly covers "annotate part of a non-text/non-html publication".
  This would also help with annotating data use cases that were brought up
  on the Community Group list.

  Thanks!

  Rob







  On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
  wrote:
   Given there are no UCs for resources such as maps, perhaps the title
   should qualify its scope by adding "... for [Digital] Publications"?

   -Cheers, AB