What if the map is in SVG? Wouldn't that cause it to fall here, since SVG is part of HTML5? Leonard From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com<mailto:azaroth42@gmail.com>> Date: Friday, March 14, 2014 at 10:53 AM To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com<mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com>> Cc: W3C Public Digital Publishing Mailing List <public-digipub@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub@w3.org>> Subject: Re: Comment re http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-dpub-annotation-uc-20140313/ Resent-From: <public-digipub@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub@w3.org>> Resent-Date: Friday, March 14, 2014 at 10:54 AM Hi Art, There are no use cases /specifically/ about maps, but annotating a digitized image of a physical map or born digital image would be covered under 2.2.4. This assumes the map is embedded in a larger publication rather than being a stand-alone resource. I agree there isn't a use case that directly covers "annotate part of a non-text/non-html publication". This would also help with annotating data use cases that were brought up on the Community Group list. Thanks! Rob On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com<mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com>> wrote: Given there are no UCs for resources such as maps, perhaps the title should qualify its scope by adding "... for [Digital] Publications"? -Cheers, AB
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 15:16:02 UTC