- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:07:19 -0500
- To: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C Public Digital Publishing Mailing List <public-digipub@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 8 December 2014 16:07:46 UTC
Hi Liam, MathML, SVG, RDFa, and other markup structures aren't called out in particular, but that the body of the annotation should be able to be any format is called out in 2.1.5. As it can be any format, it can be a format that contains structured markup. And similarly discovery of annotations should include discovery of all annotations, including those with markup in the body... which may or may not be embedded within the graph. So you didn't miss them, the use cases are just described at a higher level than any individual technology for the body (or target). Thanks! Rob On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote: > > I may have missed it, but didn't see in the annotations requirements for > . mathml in an annotation > . svg in an annotation > . other complex markup in an annotation, even just b and i > . rdfa in annotations > . ability to search/query annotations that contain markup > > Liam > > -- > Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ > Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ > > -- Rob Sanderson Technology Collaboration Facilitator Digital Library Systems and Services Stanford, CA 94305
Received on Monday, 8 December 2014 16:07:46 UTC