- From: Tim Clark <tim_clark@harvard.edu>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:58:55 -0500
- To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C Public Digital Publishing IG Mailing List <public-digipub-ig-comment@w3.org>, W3C Public Digital Publishing IG Mailing List <public-digipub@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1365746A-2BE3-4EB1-B3EE-1D3D566C544B@harvard.edu>
Hi Bert, Claims in this context mean scientific assertions. To take a real example, this is a scientific claim citing a table (Table S1) in supplemental material. "We find that neurons in the granular layer of the DG devel- oped tau pathology several months after lesions appeared in the MEC, with Alz50-positive and PHF1-positive soma appear- ing in the DG at 18 months and Gallyas- and Thioflavin S-positivesoma appearing at 24 months (Table S1; Figure S2)." (quoted from de Calignon A, Polydoro M, Suárez-Calvet M, et al. Propagation of Tau Pathology in a Model of Early Alzheimer's Disease. Neuron. 2012;73(4):685-697. ) The actual table is a graphic and cannot be interrogated. Principle 3 recommends that this "supplementary" data be cited along with the claim - which is done already here. Principle 4 recommends that it be cited with a DOI or other unique identifier - this could be for the whole set of supplementary data, or for subdivisions of the set. Best Tim Clark On Nov 25, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org> wrote: > On Nov 23, 2013, at 06:34, Ivan Herman wrote: > >> This is only of a tangential interest for many of you, because it is an issue for scholarly publishing only but, for those of you that may be in that particular area, too, it may become interesting: >> >> DRAFT - Declaration of Data Citation Principles >> http://www.force11.org/datacitation >> >> comments are welcome to finalize this. > > Three questions: > > 1) What falls under data and what doesn't? I guess lists of observations, linguistic corpora, video recordings, and other data that you collect fall under data, but how about software that the researcher created himself? > > 2) Assuming you can cite software, how about hardware that was created specifically for some research. Can you cite that, too? > > 3) I don't understand principle 3: what claims are meant here? > > > > Bert > -- > Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ > http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM > bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 > +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 21:59:55 UTC