Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion)

On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 10:50 -0500, John Foliot wrote:
> 
[...]
> I began to wonder aloud if using a similar mechanism (up to, and
> including piggy-backing on the Digital Publishing's IG concept of
> 'manifest' above) might not be a more efficient and economical way of
> capturing and conveying *personalization options* at a site-wide
> level (as opposed to the "page" or single-screen
> level).


It might be; there's some dissent within the epub group(s) about
whether a manifest is needed for pwp or could simply be LINK elements
from an HTML file at the root.

But for sure it's a concept worth considering.

Liam


-- 
Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org>
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2017 17:01:16 UTC