- From: Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:54:40 -0400
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADExNBPKGeztX2+M8-+Q9mm29v15Tt8hWuk+=Vx00ah9pw+7XQ@mail.gmail.com>
+1 Well, if we can't do "Ruminations on", I like "Deliberations on". :-) Best, Garth On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > I would propose three things. > > - The IG is winding down anyway, and I do not think it would work on its > document in the upcoming time. I would propose that IG publish these > documents as IG Notes as soon as possible (which will mean after the AC > meeting when the publishing moratorium is over). > - To avoid any further misunderstandings I would prefer the IG > change/modify the title of the documents rather than change the charter. "Ruminations > on Web Publications" sounds sexy, but I am not sure it is appropriate for a > W3C /TR document. > - Add some texts on the fact that the WG has the possibility to change the > names if it wishes to do so. > > > As for 'ruminations'… > > - "Technical reflections on Web Publications" > - "Contemplating Web Publications" > - "Deliberations on Web Publications" > > The input of a native Anglo-Saxon may be helpful here… > > Ivan > > > On 19 Apr 2017, at 15:35, Garth Conboy <garth@google.com> wrote: > > Okay, got it. > > I'll leave our Charter Master Extraordinaire, Ivan, to propose any > clarifying language. :-) > > Best, > Garth > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Daniel Glazman < > daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > >> Le 19/04/2017 à 14:52, Garth Conboy a écrit : >> >> > We could, as you suggest in your other mail, decide to find another name >> > for the input document or deliverables but we all know that such >> > discussion could lead to a long bike-shedding match -- I fear that. >> > Instead, if necessary, we can add to the charter something making it >> > clear that the WG has the possibility (as all WG-s have by default) to >> > change the terms used in the deliverables and/or completely ignore the >> > input documents, if that makes things clearer. >> >> I have no religion here. Only thing I know if that even a geeky reader >> like myself found "Web Publications" and "Web Publications" on one hand, >> "Portable Web Publications" and "Portable Web Publications" on the >> other, rather confusing. Your reading of the prose, where documents >> are different and WG ones are not supposed to be the REC track of the >> IG ones, was 100% unclear to me. If it was unclear to me, it's probably >> unclear to some others too... >> >> </Daniel> >> >> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Publishing@W3C Technical Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 <+31%206%2041044153> > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 13:56:22 UTC