- From: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 23:54:02 -0700
- To: Bill McCoy <whmccoy@gmail.com>, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
- Cc: "Cramer, Dave" <dave.cramer@hbgusa.com>, Mike Perlman <perlmanm@me.com>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, Bill McCoy <bmccoy@idpf.org>
On September 22, 2016 at 4:50:44 PM, Leonard Rosenthol (lrosenth@adobe.com) wrote: > >We should be trying to figure out what fundamentally makes an arbitrary collection > of OWP materials a publication and defining the > >minimum necessary superstructure that supports publication use cases, not mandating > or excluding that authors/publishers use any > >particular OWP technologies > > > I can certainly see this approach as well – however, to me (and maybe I am splitting hairs) > – this way seems to want to create a new class of “web thing” called a Publication (vs. a > page or site). To me, it’s more about HOW you use certain things than what you call it. But > we’ll all learn as we go. Agree. Hopefully we don't need to call them anything... it does sometimes help tho to communicate the concept... like "Progressive Web Apps" is no-one's favorite (tho good for marketing:)), but it gives a name to a set of ideas that come together to form a thing... might be the same here with whatever we end up with.
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2016 06:54:33 UTC