- From: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:19:39 +0000
- To: "public-digipub-ig@w3.org" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CY1PR0601MB1422FF8F1B6544DAE7A9DD0BDFC20@CY1PR0601MB1422.namprd06.prod.outlook.>
Hi, folks- Today's Locators Task Force meeting is cancelled, but our Task is not. ;-) It has been suggested by several people that focusing on the actual structure of the locator, and getting a strawman proposal written down, is what we need to do now. There has been some interesting discussion on the list: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2015Dec/0163.html (from Daniel Weck) https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2016Jan/0095.html (from Ángel González) Ivan suggests that we need to write down: - what should a GET return for a locator (something which is or either refers to a manifest in the abstract sense) - what should a manifest, conceptually, include. At this moment, I see - an *identifier* - a mapping from absolute URL-s to relative URL-s (where relative means relative to the PWP instance URL) - a mapping from relative URL-s to absolute URL-s Could somebody volunteer to draft a strawman proposal that we can use for the basis of discussion going forward? --Bill Bill Kasdorf Vice President, Apex Content Solutions Apex CoVantage W: +1 734-904-6252 M: +1 734-904-6252 @BillKasdorf<http://twitter.com/#!/BillKasdorf> bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en> www.apexcovantage.com<http://www.apexcovantage.com/> [Corporate Logo-Copy]
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: image001.jpg
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2016 14:20:13 UTC