- From: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 05:37:45 +0000
- To: Jason White <jjwhite@ets.org>
- Cc: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org>, "DPUB mailing list (public-digipub-ig@w3.org)" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>, ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+FkZ9HLywBhbnNYwvRxnZ2XBjmDRkLrcX_UrajXoO28BDKC0g@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Jason, in the suggested usage of a Media Query, would a CSS selector be used to match all available extended descriptions in the document? If so, then it would make sense to enable content discovery via a well-defined "type" or "role" for the details element (see my previous comment regarding text in the summary element). Daniel On 13 Jan 2016 2:17 a.m., "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote: > > > On Jan 12, 2016, at 18:35, Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 21:16 +0000, White, Jason J wrote: > >>> On Jan 12, 2016, at 14:57, Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wile > >>> y.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> One of the issues that we have not fully resolved is that, > >>> especially when using <details> and <summary>, there is nothing to > >>> indicate to users that the content is a description. > > > > [...] > > > >> This can be solved today by providing suitable text in the SUMMARY > >> element, as your examples demonstrate. I wouldn’t be opposed to a new > >> ArIA property, but I suspect the need for it is overestimated. > > > > I worry first that it's hard enough to get people to add image > > descriptions; do you think people would actually put appropriate text? > > Yes, I think the people who make the effort to use the ALT attribute, then > to include a detailed description, are exactly the authors who are most > likely to place appropriate text in the SUMMARY element. > > > In addition, how will people who see the images feel about the text? > > This depends on whether the media query becomes available, as has been > proposed, for authors to hide the SUMMARY/DETAILS elements from people who > do not elect to view extended descriptions. > > Finding out to what extent people are in fact annoyed by such additional > text would be worthy of an empirical investigation. > > > ________________________________ > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or > confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom > it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail > in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or > take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete > it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. > > > Thank you for your compliance. > > ________________________________ >
Received on Wednesday, 13 January 2016 05:38:15 UTC