- From: Nick Ruffilo <nickruffilo@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:37:27 -0500
- To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
- Cc: "Cramer, Dave" <Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Tzviya Siegman <tsiegman@wiley.com>, Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+Dds5_71egh3kVmQg9Z6Tfhff_rkFVJtMpGcrPRvpv3mvithg@mail.gmail.com>
Leonard, That makes sense and you bring up a great point. The solution to online/offline should not necessarily BE service workers, but making sure that our solution is doable using an existing spec or technology is a good idea. I was looking at it backwards (or maybe forwards the first time, I'm a bit spun around). -Nick On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> wrote: > Dave and Nick – I agree that discussing something (eg. service workers) as > one way that an RS might address the problem is certainly in scope, as it > validates that one can accomplish the task using existing solutions. > However, I just want to make sure that we are talking about it as one > possible solution and not the one and only (and/or mandated) solution. > > Leonard > > From: Nick Ruffilo <nickruffilo@gmail.com> > Date: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 at 10:30 AM > To: "Cramer, Dave" <Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com> > Cc: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, > Tzviya Siegman <tsiegman@wiley.com>, Charles LaPierre < > charlesl@benetech.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG < > public-digipub-ig@w3.org> > Subject: Re: Musings on PWP Offline/Online Modes > > Maybe I'm just wearing too many hats, and it's constricting the bloodflow > to my brain, but it seems to be - while we shouldn't actually dictate or > care how a reading system does something, we should most certainly look to > solve our problems with existing tools, especially ones that are also part > of a standards committee and implementation exists. > > -Nick > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Cramer, Dave <Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com> > wrote: > >> On Jan 5, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> Nick – the specifics of how an RS chooses (or not) to cache are out of >> scope for PWP. They may make sense for some sort of format-specific work >> (eg. best practices for PWP with EPUB) but we don’t care about it here. >> >> Remember – PWP is format/packaging and implementation agnostic. (we >> seemed to all agree to that pre-holidays) >> >> >> The fact that an existing web technology can solve a critical use case >> for PWP is on-topic in my opinion, and learning about such things can only >> help our work. Such technologies may not be a part of the documents we >> produce, but saying "we don't care about it here" I think sends the wrong >> message. >> >> Dave >> This may contain confidential material. If you are not an intended >> recipient, please notify the sender, delete immediately, and understand >> that no disclosure or reliance on the information herein is permitted. >> Hachette Book Group may monitor email to and from our network. >> > > > > -- > - Nick Ruffilo > @NickRuffilo > http://Aerbook.com > http://twitch.tv/TheWizardLlewyn > http://ZenOfTechnology.com <http://zenoftechnology.com/> > > -- - Nick Ruffilo @NickRuffilo http://Aerbook.com http://twitch.tv/TheWizardLlewyn http://ZenOfTechnology.com <http://zenoftechnology.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2016 15:37:58 UTC