- From: Ben De Meester <ben.demeester@ugent.be>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:13:31 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJ-O9Tt=LYkX_V+pMrA8ruRiqu1NDr+tuPM5RCu3sROOEYAXvw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ivan, all, Thanks! I find it to be a very clear statement of the problem. Some comments: Line 19 > reflecting the unpacked state in terms of (file) structure the *Canonical Locator* of the Mona Lisa image is ` http://book.org/published-books/1/mona_lisa.jpg` _I assume you mean `http://book.org/published-books/1/*img/*mona_lisa.jpg`?_ _Also, I think we agreed that **L** doesn't have to be different than **Lu**, maybe we should keep that documented here as well._ Line 32 > * **M** contains a reference to **L**, and **M** is also available in all the different states of **P**. _This would mean that all different states of **P** have references to **Lp** and **Lu**, right? I would lessen the constraint:_ * **M** contains a reference to **L**, and ***L*** is also available in all the different states of **P**. _Given your possible answer on Q1, you can get to **M** via **L**, and thus a connection can then be made between the different states of **P** via **M**, so this change would not introduce conflicts_ Line 37 > Although our discussions should be technology dependent, it is clear that this aspect of a PWP Processor, more exactly the implementation strategy thereof, resembles that of Service Workers. Ie, if Service Workers are not available, then the implementation of a PWP Processor may require to implement some of the Service Worker features. _I assume you mean technology *in*dependent? :)_ Line 51 > 2. As a consequence, **M** contains the list of states (and their Locators) that are available on **S**. In other words, it “knows” **Lp** and **Lu**, together with their media types. _Given my remark above, I agree :)_ Line 60 > * If the preferred state is the packed one, then **Lp** accessed, unpacked, and the image is localized within the unpacked content (and that usually means using the relative URL as some sort of a file system path within that unpacked content) _To be clear, this means the PWP on **Lp** is downloaded entirely and the image is retrieved client-side, right? I agree that this is a viable solution, with minimal server requirements. But if your server is smarter, it can retrieve that image client-side and return that image directly. Do we need to fix that functionality as either client-side or server-side? Can't we just define functionalities and let implementers implement as they see fit? Or is that just crazy talk? :)_ I fully agree on your possible solution to Q1, no comments there :) Thanks, and kind regards, Ben Ben De Meester Researcher Semantic Web Ghent University - iMinds - Data Science Lab | Faculty of Engineering and Architecture | Department of Electronics and Information Systems Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Ghent, Belgium t: +32 9 331 49 59 | e: ben.demeester@ugent.be | URL: http://users.ugent.be/~bjdmeest/ 2016-02-11 18:28 GMT+01:00 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>: > Ben, everybody > > > I have given some thoughts over the last discussion we had yesterday at > the end of the call. I have spent some time to make a more detailed writeup > over those questions; instead of sending around a very long mail, I have > uploaded a separate document onto the repo: > > https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-loc/blob/gh-pages/drafts/ivans-musings.md > > Comments/changes/issues please! > > To increase your appetite, here are the two questions I was musing about: > > • Q1: What is the answer of the server to a 'HTTP Get > http://book.org/published-books/1' request? > • Q2: How does a PWP Processor accesses the Mona Lisa image when ' > http://book.org/published-books/1/img/mona_lisa.jpg' is requested by the > Reading System? > > Caveat: my regrets for the next call. I am double booked in February, and > next time I must go to my other call:-( > > Cheers > > Ivan > > > On 11 Feb 2016, at 13:50, Ben De Meester <ben.demeester@ugent.be> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I updated the markdown on the git repo ( > https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-loc/blob/gh-pages/locators.md), trying to > incorporate the discussion of the previous call. > > I also added 2 new sections: functionalities (i.e., what specific > functionalities are needed to support PWPs, e.g., mapping from canonical to > state locator, displaying a resource, etc.), and issues. > > Issue 1 is the issue as discussed last on the call, issue 2 is one Ivan > mentioned in his last comment to the previous draft: what do you get when > GETting the unpacked PWP? > > Comments are most welcome! > > Kind regards, > Ben > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > > >
Received on Friday, 12 February 2016 09:14:21 UTC