W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > December 2016

Re: Draft Charter seems to required that the IDPF and W3C plans go through...

From: Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 07:46:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CADExNBN-sJ_QSFh=K-oHfW0-W9uOPhqRoNBP+Xz+Nv13ien1HA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Cc: "DPUB mailing list (public-digipub-ig@w3.org)" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Hi Leonard,

The IDPF membership overwhelming approved the merger and the IDPF and W3C
are proceeding with completing the "merger."

I think, at this stage, it's appropriate to proceed as if the terms if the
merger will impact our activities -- including chartering the the DPUB WG
(which is part of merger terms).

If the merger doesn't happen, I'd still view any input the DPUB IG has now
to this very early draft charter as quite relevant to the direction we'd
pursue independently.

Best,
   Garth

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
wrote:

> Many parts of the current (very early) Draft Charter are tied to the
> assumptions that
>
> (a)     the combination of the two organizations will complete
>
> (b)     the IDPF membership will allow the transition of EPUB3 to W3C
>
>
>
> It seems to me that since neither of those is a fait accompli, we should
> not be building our charter around them.  Either that, or the charter
> should clearly spell out alternatives in the case that one or both fail to
> happen.
>
>
>
> Leonard
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 9 December 2016 15:46:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:36:36 UTC