- From: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 18:40:42 -0500
- To: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org>
- Cc: public-digipub-ig@w3.org
Received on Monday, 25 April 2016 23:41:37 UTC
Comments inline: On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 12:07 -0500, Shane McCarron wrote: > > There was a question in the meeting today about whether a > > bibliography > > > [...] > > - If "type" is empty for a note, then prefer its title attribute > > for > > display value > > In general it's poor design to take text content from attributes, > because that precludes having markup (e.g. if a bibliographic reference > italicizes "et al." in the list of authors or puts a journal volume > number in bold, or has Japanese ruby annotations). So I'm a little wary > of this. See [Quin, Rueben, Io _et. al_, 1984_b_] for details :-). > Yeah - I am aware of this (obviously). But I don't really have a good alternative that would be both flexible AND easy to use. The title attribute accommodates popular citation styles (e.g., APA). Do you have an alternate suggestion?
Received on Monday, 25 April 2016 23:41:37 UTC