W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > April 2016

Re: Wiki summary of q element default styling issues

From: Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14@telia.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:39:03 +0200
To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, <ishida@w3.org>
CC: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>, www International <www-international@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D33EEAE7.35F40%kent.karlsson14@telia.com>

Den 2016-04-21 18:29, skrev "John Cowan" <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>:

> As long as you are adding minority opinions, why not add mine, which has
> seen some support on this list?
> "Others believe that even if the behavior of the q element were to be
> fully standardized, no single set of conventions can meet all needs,
> and that therefore the q element should be avoided in favor of explicit
> quotation marks, unless semantic analysis needs to determine which
> parts of the text are quotations.  In this case, each q element should
> be associated with a class which bears an explicit CSS quote property."

I agree with John's comment.

/Kent Karlsson
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 18:39:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:36:26 UTC