- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:37:54 -0400
- To: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>, "public-digipub-ig@w3.org" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
On 22/09/2015 17:25 , Bill Kasdorf wrote: > Thanks. And do you see any inherent problem in this > microdata/RDFa-in-schema.org approach conflicting in any way with > ARIA? Is there any reason the same sort of semantics couldn't or > shouldn't be captured both ways? This is not a rhetorical question. > Your answer may be yes, there is a reason, and if so I'd like to know > that! I don't see a conflict in ARIA, in fact they could complement one another nicely. That said, I don't think that ARIA should become a universal semantics layer. Capturing some important relatively high-level landmarks and features in the way that the DPUB ARIA currently does makes (a lot of) sense, disambiguating a page from a page range very likely isn't (whereas it could be useful information for a machine). Syntactically there is no conflict, so we ought to be fine. -- • Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon • http://science.ai/ — intelligent science publishing •
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2015 21:38:26 UTC