- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:13:34 -0400
- To: "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>, "public-digipub-ig@w3.org" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
On 22/09/2015 12:45 , Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken wrote: > So, JATS could be translated into HTML + RDFa? Now, we just need to > convince NIH. We're already doing that. Well, we're not starting from JATS but from CrossRef; but I don't think the difference matters. That's where my question is coming from. We have enough structured information that we can rewire the layout based on semantics, but I'd like to have an ideal, baseline, purely document-based ordering (and punctuating) of the citation so that AT that doesn't take visual style into account gets the best experience. Once I have that I can have it turn into Vancouver, Harvard, etc. styles on demand. I can even make it several shades of pastel with emoji separators. -- • Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon • http://science.ai/ — intelligent science publishing •
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2015 19:14:04 UTC