W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > September 2015

Best citation format for accessibility

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:41:26 -0400
Message-ID: <56016896.6070000@berjon.com>
To: public-digipub-ig@w3.org

citations in scholarly publishing have a long history of at-time
acrimonious disagreement over the exact format one should set them in.
There can be long arguments about the how and why of some specific
detail, but these are all about visual presentation. I have yet to hear
someone discuss the best format to use for the *content*, when in
digital form, such that it is most accessible.

By applying some technology, we can reformat a citation for visual
rendering. We can even make citation formatting follow readers'
preferences rather than publishers'. But when doing so the HTML-level
encoding of the citations should be optimised for semantic, non-visual

So my question is: has anyone given thought to what the best order of
content and best markup practices would be for optimally accessible


Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2015 14:41:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:36:12 UTC