- From: Bill McCoy <bmccoy@idpf.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 14:13:44 -0700
- To: Olaf Drümmer <olaf@druemmer.com>
- Cc: Deborah Kaplan <dkaplan@safaribooksonline.com>, Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADMjS0aJhm8L5pF3w4J3F26K23dQ8n8iafx3rEKCWW7qMmXr+A@mail.gmail.com>
I agree with Olaf, although I would prefer even more "collated", "collected" or "assembled" rather than "intended" (which to me implies consciousness, which we should not... yet/quite... ascribe to a machine process nor even to an organization). the other terms imply action but not awareness (curated being worst of all since it implies both conscious action), unfortunately the other three I suggested are also a bit inappropriately skeumorphic when applied to distributed digital resources... Could an entire git repository a document (in the sense we mean for this activity)? I don't think so. Could a particular snapshot (e.g. current mainline or a named release) of a git repository be a document... yes, I think so. It is a specific instantiation of a set of interdependent related resources. But to me, it wouldn't have to be "curated" nor necessarily even "intended" to qualify as such. --Bill On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Olaf Drümmer <olaf@druemmer.com> wrote: > On 8 Sep 2015, at 22:41, Bill McCoy <bmccoy@idpf.org> wrote: > > For example a realization of my monthly bank statement will be a document, > but it is not curated by a human. > > > I actually believe it is curated to a very high degree because a well > defined process produces it, and expresses the curating intention of the > organisation that is sending it to you. So it is not directly curated by a > human, but indirectly. > > Nonetheless I would keep curation out of the text for the definitions, and > condense it into 'intended'. Joseph Beuys (German artist) once put a pile > of grease somewhere and intended it to be a work of art (not sure how much > curation went on while he was doing it, at least it didn't turn into > cheese). Some cleaning person did not get the message and… Anyway: that > pile of grease would have to be considered a document, its portability only > limited by climate/temperature ;-). If Beuys had incidentally dropped a > same shaped and same sized pile of grease, it would not have been a > document. > > Olaf > > -- Bill McCoy Executive Director International Digital Publishing Forum (IDPF) email: bmccoy@idpf.org mobile: +1 206 353 0233
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2015 21:14:13 UTC