W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > September 2015

Re: [Glossary] Definition of a portable document (and other things...)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:41:32 +0200
Cc: W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, Deborah Kaplan <dkaplan@safaribooksonline.com>, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>, Bill McCoy <bmccoy@idpf.org>
Message-Id: <9BD38A6D-1C97-4B79-865D-9147CA73DEA4@w3.org>
To: Olaf Drümmer <olaf@druemmer.com>

> On 08 Sep 2015, at 10:26 , Olaf Drümmer <olaf@druemmer.com> wrote:
> 
> Might be just my very personal point of view (though stemming from having been involved in committee work for about 20 years) but unless you clearly separate one (core definition of what something is) from the other (what would be required to make 'it'  such that it has desirable characteristics …) you might have never ending fruitless discussions for not worthwhile reason.
> 
> Anyway, I'll shut up now on this aspect…

Let us see what other people say…

Ivan

> 
> Olaf
> 
> On 8 Sep 2015, at 06:22, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org <mailto:ivan@w3.org>> wrote:
> 
>> I am a bit afraid of overcomplicating things by introducing too many terms.  This is why it says "should" and not a "must": this is a pragmatic choice...
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704





Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2015 08:41:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:36:12 UTC