> On 21 Mar 2015, at 24:00 , Markus Gylling <markus.gylling@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, sorry for late reply.
>
> > I will take Alan's individual preference as the groups unanimous consent!
>
> Yes of course, since that matches the pattern used on www-style.
+1
Ivan
>
> /markus
>> Brady Duga 20 Mar 2015 23:39
>> I will take Alan's individual preference as the groups unanimous consent!
>>
>> Alan Stearns 19 Mar 2015 22:01
>> Speaking just for myself, I vastly prefer individual comments. It makes the discussion easier to follow on the www-style list, and I know who to ask if changes I make are sufficient to address the comment.
>>
>> From: Brady Duga
>> Date: Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 1:51 PM
>> To: W3C Digital Publishing IG
>> Subject: CSS-Break comments
>> Resent-From: <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
>> Resent-Date: Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 1:52 PM
>>
>> Brady Duga 19 Mar 2015 21:51
>> Last time we made comments on a CSS spec we did it as a group. This made requests for comments a little strange, since it wasn't clear to the CSS group who specifically had made the original comments. It required me to pay extra attention to the CSS mailing list. Are we ok with providing feedback individually instead? It would certainly make it easier for me to comment and respond to questions.
----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
