- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:46:39 +0100
- To: Tzviya Siegman <tsiegman@wiley.com>
- Cc: Peter Krautzberger <peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <F93FD232-1866-46EE-9CE8-06DD3D855083@w3.org>
> On 07 Jan 2015, at 15:35 , Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wiley.com> wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > Excellent work. > > I recommend linking to the Web Annotations WG instead of the DPUB TF > > Because some of these questions will be irrelevant to some respondents, I recommend making all questions optional. > > Question 4: target audience. Is there a way we can make this multiple choice? Perhaps: > K12 students Except that... "K12" is an Americanism. I had no idea wha that means until I began to talk to you guys... > University Students > Graduate Students That again may be unclear outside the US. Actually... I am not even 100% sure what it means. I am not a university person but I remember my son was talking about "Master student", "PhD student", or "BsC Student". What corresponds to what? Ivan > Researchers > Professionals > Other > > Question 7: I think the wording might be a little confusing because we are asking both whether existing tech is sufficient and insufficient at once. Perhaps, break it into 2 parts. (What) do you use to associate additional with your content (multiple choice). Then free-form, do you find this sufficient, please explain. > > Question 9: I am not sure that this question will be clear enough. Perhaps, we need to clarify what we mean by re-usable. Re-usable to whom? I think this is targeting the publishers in the audience and the question is whether the publishers are re-using content chunks. > > Question 15: Massive collaboration is listed twice > > Question 17: Do you want respondents to specify which tools are in use? Perhaps clarify what you’d like to see in comments. > > Question 29: I am not sure what you mean by non-web. Is this offline? Print? > > Thanks, > Tzviya > **************************** > Tzviya Siegman * Digital Book Standards & Capabilities Lead * John Wiley & Sons, Inc. > 111 River Street, MS 5-02 * Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774 * 201-748-6884 * tsiegman@wiley.com > > From: Peter Krautzberger [mailto:peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org] > Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 12:55 PM > To: W3C Digital Publishing IG > Subject: Call for comments from IG: STEM survey first draft > > Hi everyone, > > I've finished the first draft of the STEM TF Survey. > > You can find it at https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/64149/DPUB-STEM-2014-12/. > > Please take a look and post comments here. > > Best, > Peter. ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:46:50 UTC