W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > January 2015

Re: Call for comments from IG: STEM survey first draft

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:21:13 +0100
Cc: W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6453EA03-F527-44EC-AD69-004731A806DC@w3.org>
To: Peter Krautzberger <peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org>
Hey Peter,

Sorry I cannot be on the call; here are some immediate comments I have on the questions. They are all minor, which indicates that you did a great job:-)

- Question 3: with the profile of the people we may have around us, I guess and explicit entry for Computer Science may be helpful. Also, I think we should also add Humanities although I do not know whether the publisher world consider that as being part of 'Science' (I guess this is very much an issue of cultural traditions, in Hungary that is definitely 'science')

- Question 9: I am not sure what you mean there. Maybe an example would help

- Question 15: 'massive collaboration' is duplicated

- Question 16: same as question 9...

- Question 21: maybe add; "If not, why not?"

- Question 23: maybe add CSS, MathML, and maybe even SVG...

- Question 27: I am not sure I understand the question...:-(

- Question 29 & 30: comment boxes are missing

- Question 30: reproducability -> reproducibility

- Question 32: again, I am not sure what you mean in your question, including the first option...



> On 05 Jan 2015, at 18:54 , Peter Krautzberger <peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I've finished the first draft of the STEM TF Survey.
> You can find it at  https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/64149/DPUB-STEM-2014-12/.
> Please take a look and post comments here.
> Best,
> Peter.

Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704

Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:21:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:35:54 UTC