W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > February 2015

RE: Footnote discussions

From: Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wiley.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 11:33:30 -0500
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, "public-digipub-ig@w3.org" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C274A5503C851E43A8ED400AC86E028504B1C2D77C@SOM-MB.wiley.com>
Hi Shane,

Is there a working definition of the footnote element? I think it would be helpful to have some preliminary discussion on the list about this. If there is not a definition, I think we might be able to help with it.

Thanks,
Tzviya

****************************
Tzviya Siegman * Digital Book Standards & Capabilities Lead * John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
111 River Street, MS 5-02 * Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774 * 201-748-6884 * tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>

From: ahby@aptest.com [mailto:ahby@aptest.com] On Behalf Of Shane McCarron
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 11:06 AM
To: public-digipub-ig@w3.org
Subject: Footnote discussions

The HTML Accessibility Task Force has asked me to try to get input from DPub on the introduction of a footnote element (presumably for HTML 5.1).  This would be in the context of things like requirements, default role, etc.  They are looking for this input in the next two weeks.  Is there a way we could schedule some time to discuss it?  If, as I assume, that this group has opinions.

--
Shane McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Sunday, 1 February 2015 16:34:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:35:55 UTC