- From: Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) <rse@rfc-editor.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:15:20 -0700
- To: public-digipub-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <55C3CE68.6040804@rfc-editor.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 8/3/15 8:36 AM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote: > > As discussed on the call: > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-seantek-kerwin-arcmedia-type-01.txt > > The working group has closed, but if there is anything in the draft > that we find useful, we can pull from it. > > - I pulled out some notes and areas of interest for the group, just to make sure the information isn't lost in the bitstream of time: Notes from "The Archive Top-Level Media Type for File Archives" Definition of an archive - a container of one or more data objects and metadata about them. Archives are used to collect multiple data objects together into a single object for easier portability and storage. Encoding and Transport - expects viewers or browsers to understand the media type “archive/file”; else treat the media types as “application/octet-stream” (archives must be assumed to contain binary data) Registration Template - IANA registry instructions Common Required and Optional Parameters - Any implementations that are archive aware must support (at least) : Code Page 437 MS-DOS Latin US (backwards compatibility for ZIP) ; others were under discussion but left unresolved when the IETF WG closed. Split Archives - archives might be split across multiple files. The question on how to label the split content files was left open when the IETF WG closed. Fragment Identifier Syntax - the group recognized the need for some kind of fragment identifier syntax given the usual use case of a hierarchical structure within an archive file, but this was left open when the WG closed. Some particular notes regarding items to consider included: reminder fo similarties between the need here and the ‘file:' URI; "how to provide a fragment for content in the archive. NB: most archives do NOT provide Content-Type/media type information! So /foo.html being an HTML file is just an _assumption_, and possibly a very wrong one at that. There is no IETF registry for file extensions. Piped-Composite Type Suffix Syntax - no significant work or text was completed in this section. The group discussed tar piped through various compression tools as distinct file formats, but no conclusions were reached. Security Considerations - “Archives can store files, file metadata, and even entire filesystems; thus, security issues loom large because archives can contain just about anything. These concerns are magnified by the arbitrary transport of such data across the Internet." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVw85oAAoJEER/xjINbZoGmGsIAJBgOq4TBhLXts0/lszZhwSL Q0c3GXsiIugEkWJkmnQaiQXSUB+WSdxErxJlN2WxOKBcMnpIVUwkZTURtkCptPN/ ZJiCPhNZY9Cf6BFDSzf9DPFbwyYofy52RyxVc5pnLBxzIWmCTxx/N51aWPkb5D+i BY2ZlTjBozn6t/c3P+xKgpjr73a/L94NZLRTLc7fVTxYusq8nm6ldrNWMUwtkj9A EE6b5qF0KyYnNwRiJCADOru9SZzjmUFcK5LuznlnrFjMrCzdpOj/zuCb+bbK2FhC ISjZRAY7fwfRTxm2GD5zngjzpZbjFH7SbSZEX5PE/22BwR1eGaGNScx5NhBAnR8= =424p -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2015 21:15:30 UTC