-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 4/14/15 7:41 AM, Bill Kasdorf wrote: > > Good point. Heather, am I right that they are clearly and explicitly labelled as abstracts in the content? That has a bearing on the AT issues, imo.--Bill > Yes. Labelled for both human and machine consumption. The XML tagging looks like this: 2.1. <abstract> Contains the abstract of the document. See [RFC7322] for more information on restrictions for the abstract. This element appears as a child element of: <front> (Section 2.27). Content model: One or more <t> elements (Section 2.54) (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffman-xml2rfc/?include_text=1) - -Heather -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVLSj7AAoJEER/xjINbZoGU70H/j2qUEMBom0422fWp22b9eMe S2j4G3kSc43fF9FzTAxXqlEShz+63qh+ZewrWbXLmgwll3nx66VQ1HtKy+Afp+7t zGhDvUSD79YjHxSl41aDJSr4gR+i+vkLY485LIcWtUjG/nsPZzavljFAWV6yeTq2 M+1JClgfvqQeFNAKOvFWPvHtt/A+4ygtSQgqAS2nD8pPMS8Cv3QMuqDK/z/mq7sp laBa1nF5fINKE35HbsqH6S0/eaykFp3A8xNGR5C/+G+IsmK1gMb/LSF5g6Qi9EAX STd0XxSHpIv3zXua8HiqYGlDd6s5KbIuUNrpi+AqehSnSGmodk6/EWvMyhs8UZc= =P3oY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2015 14:50:05 UTC