- From: Nick Ruffilo <nickruffilo@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 14:40:15 -0400
- To: Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@bell.net>
- Cc: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>, AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, "Stein, Ayla" <astein@illinois.edu>, Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+Dds58jrXgdX1OfEzdyx2DcA9YJ+oqSkbNiK+awCX6h=0q9sg@mail.gmail.com>
Matt, Thanks. I don't quite understand what the 2nd part means. Does that mean an <A> without an HREF is just a "If I knew what the URL was, I'd put a link here, but I don't?" or is it along the lines of "I would like a link to be able to point to this specific point in the document." I know that in practice, using # in a URL, the browser will simply find anything with that ID and scroll to it, turning any item with a unique identifier into an anchor of sorts. -Nick On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@bell.net> wrote: > The name attribute on <a> is deprecated now. To quote from the HTML5 > spec: > > > If the a > <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/text-level-semantics.html#the-a-element> element > has an href <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#attr-hyperlink-href> attribute, > then it represents <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/dom.html#represents> a > hyperlink <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#hyperlink> (a hypertext > anchor) labeled by its contents. > > If the a > <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/text-level-semantics.html#the-a-element> element > has no href <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#attr-hyperlink-href> attribute, > then the element represents > <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/dom.html#represents> a placeholder for where > a link might otherwise have been placed, if it had been relevant, > consisting of just the element's contents. > > *From:* Nick Ruffilo <nickruffilo@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 08, 2015 2:25 PM > *To:* Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@bell.net> > *Cc:* Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com> ; Dave Cramer > <dauwhe@gmail.com> ; AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr> ; Ivan > Herman <ivan@w3.org> ; Stein, Ayla <astein@illinois.edu> ; Thierry Michel > <tmichel@w3.org> ; W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: [dpub identifiers] Please review updated Identifiers TF > wiki > > Isn't the <a> supposed to be an anchor and not a link? And <a> with a > href="" is clearly a link, but otherwise, couldn't an anchor point be a > logical generic grouping point. > > In the early days of web development, that is exactly how I utilized it: > > <a href="#gohere">Go there</a> > > > <a id="gohere" name="gohere"/> > <h1>This is where I want to be</h1> > > > There is probably a better way to do this, but I would argue that <a> - > unless it has been re-defined to mean link and not anchor (which is > extremely possible, I've still to read MUCH of the w3c docs) it would fit. > > -Nick > > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@bell.net> > wrote: > >> A few points: >> >> - epub uses the epub:type value “pagebreak” to identify the elements >> (the id name isn’t the indicator) >> - epub also requires @title for a human-readable value (for >> announcement by AT) >> - the use of <a> for pagebreaks isn’t ideal. A page break not a link >> to anywhere and never will be. A span is more typical. >> >> I’d also hate to think we need more markers in digital. CFIs, while >> unwieldy to write, at least go in the right direction in getting away from >> reliance on the presence of IDs + empty elements. They can also represent >> ranges better than having to insert two markers, or whatever ugliness that >> takes. >> >> ID-based markers are useful in the print/digital lookup scenario noted, >> and they’ll have life until a better/simpler method of identifying >> locations comes along, but they’re still god-awful things. >> >> You’d think in a digital world we could pull out/identify/highlight any >> passage of text we want, not be as functionally useless to readers as page >> numbers. But here we are... >> >> Matt >> >> *From:* Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 08, 2015 1:32 PM >> *To:* Nick Ruffilo <nickruffilo@gmail.com> ; Dave Cramer >> <dauwhe@gmail.com> >> *Cc:* AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr> ; Ivan Herman >> <ivan@w3.org> ; Stein, Ayla <astein@illinois.edu> ; Thierry Michel >> <tmichel@w3.org> ; W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org> >> *Subject:* RE: [dpub identifiers] Please review updated Identifiers TF >> wiki >> >> >> Precisely! Thanks. >> >> >> >> When people respond by saying, wrt pointing just to the start of the >> print page on which the thing you really mean occurs (the thing the index >> entry means, the thing the cross reference is referencing, etc.), "what the >> heck good is that?", I point out that that is precisely all that those >> things have ever done in print. J They just say "somewhere between this >> point, where page 53 begins, and the next such milestone marker, which says >> where page 54 begins . . . somewhere between those two markers is the thing >> I'm trying to direct your attention to." So using them is regrettably no >> better, but at least no worse, than what they've always done. >> >> >> >> --Bill K >> >> >> >> *From:* Nick Ruffilo [mailto:nickruffilo@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 08, 2015 1:25 PM >> *To:* Dave Cramer >> *Cc:* AUDRAIN LUC; Ivan Herman; Bill Kasdorf; Stein, Ayla; Thierry >> Michel; W3C Digital Publishing IG >> *Subject:* Re: [dpub identifiers] Please review updated Identifiers TF >> wiki >> >> >> >> My apologies if this has been asked before, but is there a generic >> "milestone" type ID? Ultimately that's what a page-number is. The same >> way a section heading, or chapter is a chunk identifier, a page is ALSO a >> chunk identifier. The fact that the context is related to a concept >> foreign to screens (or at least, difficult to understand when it comes to >> screens) if you think of it as a "physical_page_number" as opposed to just >> "page_number" the conceptual chunk because significantly clearer and more >> meaningful. >> >> >> >> If this doesn't make sense, let me know and I'll try to word it elsewise. >> >> >> >> -Nick >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:41 PM, AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr> >> wrote: >> >> >> In EPUB3 files, HTML content is tagged with empty anchors like : >> "Ils n¹en veulent pas, ils n¹en <a id="page_182"/>veulent pas, elle lâche >> dans un soupir en attrapant encore une lettre." >> >> This means that a new paper page starts at word « veulent ». >> >> In parallel, the EPUB3 nav document contains an ordered list of navigation >> points in a <nav epub:type="page-list »> element : >> <li> >> <a href="chap22.html#page_182">Page 182</a> >> </li> >> Then the label of this paper page 182 is « Page 182 ». >> >> >> In term of worflow, by good practice, we produced a new EPUB file as soon >> as text corrections have been inserted in the reprint book. >> >> >> >> >> >> In EPUB3, there's metadata that should indicate which print edition the >> pagination information is taken from [1]: >> >> >> >> <dc:source id="src-id">urn:isbn:9780375704024</dc:source> >> >> <meta refines="#src-id" property="identifier-type" scheme="onix:codelist5">15</meta> >> >> <meta refines="#src-id" property="source-of">pagination</meta> >> >> >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> [1] >> http://www.idpf.org/epub/301/spec/epub-publications.html#sec-opf-dcsource >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> - Nick Ruffilo >> >> @NickRuffilo >> >> http://Aerbook.com >> >> http://ZenOfTechnology.com <http://zenoftechnology.com/> >> >> >> > > > > -- > - Nick Ruffilo > @NickRuffilo > http://Aerbook.com > http://ZenOfTechnology.com <http://zenoftechnology.com/> > > -- - Nick Ruffilo @NickRuffilo http://Aerbook.com http://ZenOfTechnology.com <http://zenoftechnology.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2015 18:40:46 UTC