- From: LAURA DAWSON <ljndawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:21:37 -0400
- To: Graham Bell <graham@editeur.org>, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- CC: "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>, Madi Weland Solomon <madi.solomon@pearson.com>
- Message-ID: <D03DB588.7F001%ljndawson@gmail.com>
And that complexity is why ONIX is almost never used properly by either senders or receivers the context almost universally is mis-matched. What wešre seeing is the increasing datafication of a business that until quite recently resisted attempts at quantification. And wešre seeing it reaching down into levels that include people who have actively resisted quantification so they are confronted with begrudgingly having to do things for reasons they donšt always understand. We see this with self-published authors all the time they fill out metadata forms with the least amount of information possible because the process is unpleasant not realizing that their reluctance to provide information means their book wonšt get discovered and nobody will buy it. From: Graham Bell <graham@editeur.org> Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 at 7:59 AM To: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> Cc: Laura Dawson <ljndawson@gmail.com>, "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>, Madi Solomon <Madi.Solomon@pearson.com> Subject: Re: [METADATA] Governance/authority (ISSUE-2) On 16 Sep 2014, at 00:15, Liam R E Quin wrote: > On Mon, 15 Sep 201418:11:39 -0400 > >> Page count is another one of those troublesome fields. :) > > I have my trusty copy of McKerrow on hand for bibliography and citing > collations :-) > > > -- > Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Liam This is interesting in the context of a discussion about complexity -- and though the following comes from the print book world, it maybe helps illustrate... The point about page counts (extents) that Laura hints at is that the correct page count depends who you are. If you are in a publisher's editorial department, then you'll remember to count the roman numbered pages (the 'prelims'). If you are a member of the public, most likely you won't -- you'll just look at the highest numbered page. If you are in production, and responsible for ordering the paper, then you'll count the prelims, the main body of the book, the end matter, the blank and unnumbered pages at the end, and you might also remember to count the unnumbered pages in a plate section (a special insert for photographs, which is usually unnumbered because you can't always predict at which point in the book it will be bound in). None of these views is wrong -- the seemingly simple question 'What is the page count?" has several correct answers, each of them contextual. ONIX appears complex (no, I'll say it, it is complex) because it allows any or all of these correct answers to be given. But it defines each answer reasonably carefully -- so you can provide a page extent without the prelims, with the prelims, counting or not counting the index, without the blanks, with the blanks, with the plate section, and so on -- and the data recipient can be sure which answer(s) you are giving. There is a controlled vocabulary of 'extent types'. It even allows extents to be given in minutes (for audiobooks) or in words (potentially useful for web publications and reflowable e-books, though right now, lack of familiarity with word counts means that non-specialists can't really judge whether an 60,000 word novel is relatively short or relatively long). Graham Graham Bell EDItEUR Tel: +44 20 7503 6418 EDItEUR Limited is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no 2994705. Registered Office: United House, North Road, London N7 9DP, UK. Website: http://www.editeur.org > > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 14:22:35 UTC