Re: ODRL Policy Language Version 2.1 Final Draft Specifications – First Call for Comments

> On 13 Nov 2014, at 02:20 , Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks! Very timely. In fact at a meeting I attended last week IDEAlliance committed to basing their rights implementation on ODRL (their focus is primarily magazines, and they are working on getting quite an extensive specification and vocabulary done in the next few months), and they also met with BISG last week, who is also working on rights issues (focusing on books). I've copied the appropriate people at those organizations to make sure they're aware of this. (You see why I was so insistent on saying that rights metadata is a big issue for publishers!)

Turning your argument around, this means that there *are* groups out there who do this. In other words, I think it was a wise decision at the F2F meeting that this Interest Group should not join a crowded party:-)

Ivan


> --Bill K
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 11:15 PM
> To: W3C Digital Publishing IG
> Cc: Madi Weland Solomon; Bill Kasdorf
> Subject: FYI: ODRL Policy Language Version 2.1 Final Draft Specifications – First Call for Comments
> 
> The issue of right management came up a lot these days; this may be relevant.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/2014/11/12/odrl-version-2-1-final-draft-specifications-first-call-for-comments/
> 
> Ivan
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C 
> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704

Received on Thursday, 13 November 2014 21:15:00 UTC