As agreed with Markus and Liza, I have just added these comments to the wiki page: https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/StructuralSemantics with the proviso that these are _not_ comments reflecting any consensus... Ivan On 08 May 2014, at 13:45 , Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Markus, Tzviya, all, > > I have tried to give my assessment on the various options listed in [1]. Note that I have also added the 'Appropriateness' feature, as discussed on the call. My assessment is attached as a text file. > > Cheers > > Ivan > > [1] https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/StructuralSemantics#Approaches:Solution_Criteria_and_Options > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > GPG: 0x343F1A3D > WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me > > > > > <content & markup.txt> ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 GPG: 0x343F1A3D WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
Received on Friday, 9 May 2014 15:47:21 UTC